BikePGH!

Ideas for future staircase runnels

This topic contains 50 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by  Benzo 5 mos, 2 weeks.

Viewing 11 posts - 41 through 51 (of 51 total)
 
Author Posts
Author Posts

Benzo

Private Message

Jan 15 2014 at 1:41pm #

Swalfoort wrote:+1 for the need for runnels at one or more of the Three Sisters Bridges down to trail level.
Access from the trail to the bridges, or from the bridges to the trail, is virtually non-existent.

Ever try riding down the switchbacks next to pnc park? if you can succeed without a footdown, then you will probably excel at cyclocross racing.

It’s so narrow that two people in wheelchairs going opposite directions probably couldn’t get by each other. One at a time, and it will take 5 minutes to navigate.


Ahlir

Private Message

Jan 15 2014 at 11:00pm #

The comment pointing out that, on the whole, habitual riders will just do the climb is spot on. It’s a matter of effort: if your legs are in good shape it’s just easier to keep riding; otherwise you have to get off, hoist the bike, maneuver it up some stairs using only your (keyboard adapted) arms, get back on, etc. Man, that is work.

My personal example is the the short push up from Saline over the track, to the UPMC parking lot and the Jail Trail. I mean, way back I thought that I was pretty cool and in the know when I was doing it. But actually, it’s a whole lot less work to zip down the street to 2nd and back up the hill to the parking lot. (While this is not a runnel thing, the concept is the same.)

So wither the runnel? Stairs where they really are the only sensible choice for the commuter.

Apart from ones that respect the effort trade-off the only ones that make sense are ones that make things accessible to the casual biker, maybe the ones who would otherwise balk at a climb up a spot of interest.

But while I have your attention (?), there is one improvement that would make a big difference: install a ramp or switchback at the Duquesne Incline:

The current scheme is useless and forces cyclists onto a roadway, where they have to negotiate an intersection and speeding traffic. Then there’s the stair piers, a bus shelter…

That sidewalk is dangerously narrow and should be widened (up to the bridge, realistically). Cars travelling at the posted speed limit would not have a problem with this, especially as they are simply heading towards a traffic light at the WE circle. Heck, I’ll even post a few bucks to some pedalstarter site to show my support.


erok

Private Message

Jan 16 2014 at 2:59pm #

One could say the same thing for bike lanes, bike racks, etc. Those of us who are riding really don’t “need” them. but they do make biking a more convenient choice for more people, and legitimize people who use them.


pinky

Private Message

Jan 16 2014 at 6:11pm #

Yes, please on the West End Bridge – particularly on the stairs on the upriver/north side of the bridge. These are the ones that let off right by the casino/trail. More and more I’m running into other cyclists as we lug our bikes up and down those stairs.

I also agree on the sister bridges, particularly 9th.


StuInMcCandless

Private Message

Jan 16 2014 at 9:31pm #

If they ever connect the dead end of Saline Street with Greenfield Ave/Rd/Pocusset, that should have one.


Ahlir

Private Message

Jan 16 2014 at 9:32pm #

Erok, point taken. But let’s be sure that the improvements happen in the right places for the right reasons.


erok

Private Message

Jan 17 2014 at 12:16pm #

no doubt. that’s the reason i made the thread


erok

Private Message

Jan 17 2014 at 12:22pm #

and trust me, it will take a long time for the next one


Ahlir

Private Message

Jan 17 2014 at 3:14pm #

Quite.

But I tend to also worry about things like the bit of Bouquet between Sennott and Clemente. It’s been fitted with a bike lane, which is nice if you’re continuing on to Joncaire or Bates. Bikes turning left onto Clemente have a bad choice, and drivers get confused (and annoyed by these bikers who refuse to stay in their lane). It would have better been sharrowed.

The lane was probably put in without input from bikers (if it was, what were those people thinking?). But hey, on paper and in the photos it looks like the bike people got what they wanted. (And still they’re complaining! Where is Rob Ford when you need him?)


Benzo

Private Message

Jan 21 2014 at 10:28am #

Ahlir wrote:But I tend to also worry about things like the bit of Bouquet between Sennott and Clemente

I ride this every day during evening rush hour, and have had no problem at all with drivers here when I simply take the lane when turning from bouqeut to clemente. I find myself having to watch out more for a huge number pedestrians jay walking here than cars misbehaving.


Benzo

Private Message

Mar 10 2014 at 9:06am #

Glenwood bridge access from GAP trail.

Baldwin road connects to the GAP trail by keystone metals, it’s relatively low traveled. A couple blocks down there are two sets of stairs that take you from baldwin road to the glenwood bridge sidewalk (east side).

The lower set of stairs starts near where baldwin road passes under riverton street overpass. it’s a bit narrow, and the stairs are not in the best condition, but this could be an ideal place to add some runnels to make a connection to the glenwood bridge.

You go up a first set of stairs which is multi-level (kind of like on west end bridge), and then follow the sidewalk about 50 feet to a narrower set of stairs (rails may need to be altered or moved to accommodate the runnel).

Viewing 11 posts - 41 through 51 (of 51 total)
 

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.