BikePGH!

Technical Means of Avoiding Fatalities

This topic contains 22 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by  Mick 1 yr, 7 mos.

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
 
Author Posts
Author Posts

David Mooney

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 7:56am #

This showed up on the BBC news site today:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22193472

Interesting approach to help avoid accidents.

–David Mooney


Marko82

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 8:30am #

While I’m in favor of almost anything that will help all of us coexist safely on the roads, I think this is even less effective than putting up share-the-road type signs. At least with the signs ALL drivers would be warned of where crashes have taken place and not just the few who have this one brand of GPS. And then there is the irony that some of the crashes could have been caused by drivers being distracted by their GPS. Ahhh technology…

At least they are admitting there is a problem though.


erok

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 8:34am #

wow, that’s seems so simple and useful.


jonawebb

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 8:57am #

Funny how I’ve never even thought of the phrase “cycle safety equipment” before, at least as applies to cars. I’m sure that if people start thinking about things they could do to cars and trucks so that cyclists will be safer, they’ll come up with a lot of good ideas, like making drivers-side doors open from the inside only partways at first, giving cyclists warning, and requiring a second pull of the handle to open wide, reminding drivers to look for cyclists.


StuInMcCandless

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 10:12am #

“…unless they were fitted with cycle safety equipment.”

We have them already. They’re called eyes.

Next topic, street design.

Next topic, adherence to existing speed and safe passing ordinances.

It will also be noted that the UK cyclist killed was an up-and-coming scientist studying polar ice caps. Also, female.


bikeygirl

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 10:16am #

I’m in for more safety…. but shouldn’t people who are driving a car should be alert and looking at the road and SEE if there are cyclists, pedestrians, or other obstacles on their way?

Having help from a device is great, but still….. common sense?


Mick

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 10:45am #

I think the custom of putting white crosses up where there has been a fatality is a useful one.

I’m guessing there would various places in the Pittsburgh area that would have more then one of them in the same place. Every year there are about 70 or 80 traffic deaths in Allegheny County.

Where were they?

Why should deaths keep going unheeded?

We complain about the lack of media coverage for hit and runs, but why isn’t each one of these tragic stories covered in depth? Many (most?) of these deaths were preventable, after all.

Shouldn’t every driver be talking -and thinking – about what happened in each fatal accident? It’s hard to imagine the bike community not doing that for a fatality.

Now, I don’t know about using Christian imagery – but shouldn’t all these places be marked somehow?


helen s

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 11:44am #

Instead of “christian imagery” (although I think a cross can serve more than one purpose, but good point) how about a skull and crossbones, or a fake dead person? Why beat around the bush- a serious incident requires a serious image.


jonawebb

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 11:48am #

Or a ghost bike…


helen s

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 11:52am #

I was thinking of representing all fatalities, not just cyclists.

I imagine some places might have a lot of little skull signs if it was an old enough city and a dangerous enough location.


Mick

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 12:19pm #

@ Helen S I was thinking of representing all fatalities, not just cyclists.

Yes!

Although it seems to me that maybe they shold be there for some time period. A decade? Until the roadway is revised? Not sure.

I don’t really care if someone died there in 1940.

And it should not be an option for local business to request they be taken down because they don’t like the negative message.


pinky

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 12:52pm #

I think a skull or fake dead body would be overwhelming and insensitive to the grieving family and friends. And pressure from them would make the sign/marker come down much faster than any upset business owner.


Mick

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 1:10pm #

Pistol with a notch on it?

(ducks and runs)


jonawebb

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 1:11pm #

Um, these aren’t “technical means”, and we already do stuff like that. How many people who are dangerous drivers pay attention to the many roadside memorials etc. we see all the time?
I like the idea of using technology to address this instead of just trying to change driver behavior by signs. Signs demonstrably don’t work well enough. And we’ve got them already. So why not try something new?
Ex. another technical way to increase road safety is to disable texting by drivers, which is tricky because you don’t want to do it for all vehicle passengers, but it is possible. You would need to put a sensor in cellphones to detect when it was in the driver’s seat, and a corresponding emitter in the seat or dashboard. You could also disable cellphone calls there.


byogman

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 1:18pm #

How about a visible police presence and actual ticketing of aggressive driving in these areas?

As for equipping vehicles to reduce dooring, jonawebb’s idea is interesting.

Thinking it would be less of a nuisance and get better results if a rear facing sensor gated the behavior but then the behavior were just not to allow the door to open without a secomd (ever so slightly out of the way) button push to override.


jonawebb

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 1:30pm #

The dooring idea originally came from BSNYC, so far as I know. Using the door handle for both initial and secondary open seems simple and natural to me. But, as I say, if car manufacturers really worked on it, they could come up with some really good solutions.


byogman

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 2:19pm #

Either are an improvement. Simple and natural make acceptance easier, but that same ease combined with invariant system behavior I think would mean that driver behavior wouldn’t actually change… it’s just that the cyclist might have a little more time.


Mikhail

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 2:31pm #

jonawebb wrote:You would need to put a sensor in cellphones to detect when it was in the driver’s seat, and a corresponding emitter in the seat or dashboard.

What does prevent someone to put your hand with cell into passenger seat?


jonawebb

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 2:34pm #

@Mikhail, right, there are always workarounds… the idea is to make texting harder.


JaySherman5000

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 3:29pm #

Why not just put devices into cars to jam all occupants’ cellphones? Then passengers with nothing better to do could look out the window and help the driver scan for hazards. More eyes = more awareness (or something like that), right?


Mikhail

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 4:02pm #

jonawebb wrote:@Mikhail, right, there are always workarounds… the idea is to make texting harder.

Sometimes making it harder is pushing people to more stupid things. :( In this particular case, I think, we are not going to decrease people significantly (since it’s not hard enough) but will increase amount of people looking down to a passenger seat. And it takes more time to turn your head to the right then just moving your eyes.


salty

Private Message

Apr 18 2013 at 6:06pm #

If I get killed by a car you can put up a skull and crossbones, or better yet just hang my mangled bloody decomposing body on a pole. Maybe that will get the point across.


Mick

Private Message

Apr 19 2013 at 1:58pm #

@Jonawebb Um, these aren’t “technical means”, and we already do stuff like that. How many people who are dangerous drivers pay attention to the many roadside memorials etc. we see all the time?

All the time? I don’t think so.

The only one I ever see is the ghost bike on Meyron Street.

There are a few section of road (think the north part of Washington Blvd) wehre there have been plenty of deaths and no indication of that.

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
 

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.