That's funny, I can't find the opinion in that article, unless it's the last sentence:
"Bicycling is a trend that should be good for the health of the region's riders, but that won't be possible until run-ins with motorized vehicles become far more rare than they have been lately."
And I'm not sure that's all that debatable, it's kind of like saying "orgasms feel good" or "chocolate is yummy". I suppose some of the trolls and ragers would debate it, but not with reason or logic.
It is nice that the opinion, apparently of the paper itself, seems to lean towards accepting bikes as traffic and the need for safer behavior on the road. Two really nice ideas to see taking hold, if honest (and not troll baiting).