A
PG article about the housing proposal, from February.
I assume the wooden ramp is the one shown
here, which was constructed as part of the detour for the Bates Street bridge replacement project (next to an existing concrete ramp that, I'm guessing, was too narrow for ADA requirements).
At that point, the trail seems to be only 18" or so above the sidewalk, so lowering it doesn't seem like a big deal. (It does start climbing up to the Bates Street bridge around there somewhere, so I guess it's possible there would a steeper climb. Or just a longer one? I can't really tell.)
I think the main trail impact will be simply the need to close the trail to do the work. But I find it hard to object to a trail closure whose aim is to provide nicer trail access to a group of future trailside residents, as long as some safe detour can be devised (which, granted, might be hard).