I went to the one at the Kaufman center today. There was some high level presenting and a ton of proposals with scores assigned by some internal criteria, models, and... well human beings.
They were looking for sanity checks on the scores since not all things scored might be accounting for things we know from experience.
There really wasn't time to go through a lot of them and I lacked a window of insight into conditions outside my bike commuting corridor.
I did meet the rockalley.org guy, who had a lot to say about the same and improving the connection from downtown to Oakland is considered a "very high priority" by everyone there.
The biking coordinator had been following the conversation thread: bike-advocacy-with-a-view-toward-cost-of-improvements. He encouraged not just incremental, but also larger "vision" type stuff, but was careful not to say too much.
But one of the overarching threads was, here's the budget we think we have now, we'd like to have more, we might reach for more in ways X,Y,Z, and you never do know when more might be possible than you envisioned... money will flow to the best projects.
So, sounds like good stuff, vague, but good. We'll see what can actually get done here in the 5 year window they're talking about. Now, apparently to stay maximally on top of this stuff, the best way is facebook. So blast it, may have to do that after all. Sigh.