"because the foreign companies can get away with exploiting their workforce"
The difference in cost of production is often marginal, I can't speak for bikes, but I read an article in the WSJ once that quoted a sock manufacturer as saying it was only a couple pennys difference in price to make a sock here vs. there because most of the production was automated regardless of the country of origin. While I readily buy into the free trade is better for everyone argument, I also recognize that the end-consumer sees very little of the gain after all the middle-men.
I definitely don't think that everything manufactured in China/Taiwan is junk but I really do wish that we had more say in the final "package" (value added in economic terms). Also, while I do believe that China *can* make a quality product, that isn't the reason that manufacturers go there. Besides, odds are that most of the welds are done by machines and not people anyways. Still, I stand by my initial reasoning for not wanting to support their economy, I simply don' think that our own exports get a fair shake and I'd rather do business (as much as possible) with countries that honor international law... if that means choosing one bicycle manufacturer over another (everything else equal), I will.
@ChemicalDave, I'm not sure if that was a serious question?
For the most part, supply chains are trade secrets unless you know someone in the know. The best you can do is to look at large scale trading data and see who is importing from where but that wouldn't really tell you anything about an individual manufacturer unless they make that info public. I've actually been looking for similar data in trying to determine where the different bicycle manufacturers source their chromoly but I haven't had much luck, and that is just trying to determine if Columbia is as good as Reynolds and how they compare to a given "house" brand. No luck. It probably doesn't really matter though.
@mr marvelous, I wouldn't sweat it too much since just about all bikes are coming from over there. Interesting side note, I have noticed that some bike shops purposely remove the little "made in China" sticker, which I also think is unethical (and probably illegal). Just consider yourself lucky that there haven't been any problems with the Portland. There have been a ton of issues with Gary Fisher 29ers made around 2008, where the seat tube breaks at the weld. I think that most across the board problems are design flaws and not manufacturing flaws, anyways.
@cburch, I was under the opposite impression, that the carbon fiber frames are where the money is and that most of the production is still in the US. I guess I just jumped to that conclusion, thinking that if Trek still made their CF frames here, the rest probably do as well. I'll take your word for it.
Not sure what your source is for the quality of welds, but again, I'll take your word for it as I imagine that most of it is done by machine these days and the same machines would be used for foreign production as domestic.